Perfect. I think I might like Ross Douthat even less. 😊 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Santafe 
<desm...@santafe.edu>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 2:23 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] AI 

This is an interesting direction. 



On Jun 21, 2025, at 5:46, Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> wrote: 


I believe it will be possible. 


Will it be a good idea? I don't know. In science fiction movies AIs often start 
to kill their creators. "Ex machina" for example is the story of such an AI 
developed by the CEO of a large corporation 

https://youtu.be/sNExF5WYMaA 



Then there is the possibility of massive unemployment because AI takes away the 
good, creative jobs. Claude's capabilities in programming are impressive. 
Stackoverflow is already in a crisis because developers ask ChatGPT, Gemini or 
Claude instead. More and more employees will lose their jobs. It doesn't look 
good. 

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/17/business/amazon-ai-human-employees-jobs 





Following the article Jochen forwarded, there is another in the same channel: 


AI warnings are the hip new way for CEOs to keep their workers afraid of losing 
their jobs | CNN Business 
<https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/18/business/ai-warnings-ceos?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc>
 
edition.cnn.com 
<https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/18/business/ai-warnings-ceos?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc>
 



It says what it says. I won’t tie myself to or away from it. 



I have been thinking for some weeks about the “pro-natalist” crowd, since they 
came up a few months ago. 




As in all this, people can come up with a narrative for pretty-much any 
position, and we are left (if we want to say something meaningful about 
causation) to figure out which, if any, of these narratives has anything to do 
with why something becomes “a movement”, to which many of the 
narrative-spinners are just fabric and hangers-on. So there can be disingenuous 
(self-disingenuous?) saps and shills like Ross Doubthat of NYT who have all 
sorts of old-fashion-values arguments about natalism. 


But to me the structure is: they are pushing somebody to have lots of babies at 
exactly the time they are engineering a world to eliminate anything like a 
human life for the babies already had. I don’t think the timing-congruence of 
those two things is coincidence and unconnected to causation. 



It’s clear that falling birthrates seem like a godsend if one thinks population 
must decrease, but doesn’t want that to happen by wars and disease epidemics, 
with lots of acute suffering. So for whom is it really not a godsend? Well, for 
people who can’t live without “being supported”. There are real 
suffering-issues for aging populations who currently depend on getting crumbs 
from the big economies for their subsistence. But we probably produce enough, 
and have enough legacy-stuff, that if we really wanted their lives to have 
manageable suffering, we could achieve that through redistribution for however 
long it will take the various generations to die off. For whom, then, is 
redistribution off the table and they need the “economy” (whatever that is 
turning into) to be big? The ones who take almost-all of it, for whom there is 
no redistribution left to capture. 



So the pro-natalist movement, in the current context of the feudalization of 
everything, seems to me like it drives paleo-feudalism into something that is 
no longer distinct from arguments for slavery, and maybe even stronger than 
that, to arguments for something more like livestock. 



Dunno. Probably I just repeat statements of the obvious, or things that are 
already in the air all around us. 



Eric 












Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to