I cannot help but think that it would slow babies down, in an otherwise
needed race to organize their perceptions, to objectify completely.
Perceptions in the first year of life look to me to be about relating a
stream, much like seeing GoL as a series of board states rather than
individual gliders or pentomino.

I continue to wonder how much investigative juice can be squeezed by
considering how different the fruits of these two perspectives are. I keep
thinking that by studying sequences of boards, one is more likely to arrive
at universal notions [◊ ⊣ □]. As one aggregates experience, perhaps a phase
shift toward taxonomy of objects and classes.

I continue to be thankful that AI video generators still produce
hallucinations that seem fundamentally different from my own. Watching
generative video has the affect on me of something like probing my
Neurological boundaries for chinks in my perception in a way that humans
seldom do for me. It is nice to be reminded that objects are more or less
my own and that everything can use a renewed look.

[◊ ⊣ □]: A continued reference to Eilenberg-Moore style monad/comonad
constructions between formal type theories and their models. In particular,
those that give rise to *GoL built on GoL* as counit to some adjunction and
*Universal Turing Machines* as unit.

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/syntactic+category
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to