Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Is this really enough? Something like: | | DoD := LODO(EXPR INT, f+->D(f,x))
Any good reason why ** and ^ should not be made syntactically equivalent, as opposed to duplicate definitions? Note that the interpreter already attempts such identification. My belief is that keeping the syntactic distinction is a good recipe for confusion and disaster. -- Gaby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
