On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > > I would rather completly get rid of **. Duplication is confusing, > keeping them different causes confusion, but making them equvalent > also will cause confusion (think of sombody trying to give a new > definition to ** but use old ^). >
+1 I do not see any reason to retain two names for the same thing. Given the limited number of useful syntactic combinations for infix operators in Axiom, I think it is better to allow ** to be easily re-used. Regards, Bill Page. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
