On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Martin Rubey wrote: > ... > I'm afraid that <, > will lead to curious syntax surprises. Note that > the comma also separates statements. > > a < b, c> d > > could be: apply d to < b, c>, and this in turn to a, > or: (a < b), (c > d) > > Of course one can try to minimise danger by introducing double > brackets, but I think time is better spent on redesign of the > categories and domains. >
I agree that redesign of categories and domains is an essential activity but I do not see it as a trade-off for improvements to the user interface. Of course it is a moot point given the limited resource available to make such changes. Regards, Bill Page. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
