On 11/18/2008 04:21 PM, Johannes Grabmeier wrote:
> actually I would like to have a notation like
> 
> (8) -> u : Vector Integer := [2,3,4]
> 
>    (8)  [2,3,4]
>                                                         Type: Vector(Integer)
> (9) -> v : Vector Integer := [2,-1,3]
> 
>    (9)  [2,- 1,3]
>                                                         Type: Vector(Integer)
> (10) -> <u,v>   // instead of dot(u,v)
> 
>    (10)  13

I guess that is impossible since <,> don't just form one function like [,].

I guess, it can either be made

[u,v]

(in Aldor it would be the 'bracket' function... but in Axiom???)

or

u.v

Unfortunately, for this case it is also equivalent with 'u v' and 'u(v)'.

Ralf

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to