Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> writes: > Attached is a patch that adds support for expected failures to > testing framework. IMHO currently testing framework has > several problem but this was probably the worst one.
I'll try not to take this personal. I always thought that my package was quite an improvement about *no* package > Namely, without such support adding tests for known bugs was > inpractical: known failures were reported exactly the same as new > ones, so they would make checking for regressions significantly > harder. Great! > The patch adds buch of xf* routines parallel to existing > ones -- the xf* routines expect failure, so they increment > separate counters for expected failures. please rename the internal routines *PasInc the *PassInc > I also added a mulitline summary at the end, which hopefully will be > clearer than existing one. I assume that what you add is a grand total over all testcases - or is it a grand total over all testsuites? Please make this clearer in the output. ============================================================================= testsuite | testcases: failed (total) | tests: failed (total) bugs2009 0 (19) 0 (69) unexpected failures: 0 expected failures: 5 unexpected passes: 0 total tests: 69 Martin
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
