Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> writes:

> Attached is a patch that adds support for expected failures to
> testing framework.  IMHO currently testing framework has
> several problem but this was probably the worst one.  

I'll try not to take this personal.  I always thought that my package
was quite an improvement about *no* package

> Namely, without such support adding tests for known bugs was
> inpractical: known failures were reported exactly the same as new
> ones, so they would make checking for regressions significantly
> harder.

Great!

> The patch adds buch of xf* routines parallel to existing
> ones -- the xf* routines expect failure, so they increment
> separate counters for expected failures.  

please rename the internal routines

*PasInc

the 

*PassInc

> I also added a mulitline summary at the end, which hopefully will be
> clearer than existing one.

I assume that what you add is a grand total over all testcases - or is
it a grand total over all testsuites?  Please make this clearer in the
output.

   =============================================================================
   testsuite | testcases: failed (total) | tests: failed (total)
   bugs2009                    0    (19)               0    (69)
   unexpected failures: 0
   expected failures: 5
   unexpected passes: 0
   total tests: 69

Martin
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to