Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Waldek,
>
> I was a bit confused by this...
>
> > "Interpreter" parser treats 'break', 'default', 'define', 'do', 'export',
> > 'free', 'inline', 'local', 'macro', 'rule' as keywords, but
> > the compiler parser do not.
>
> Here is the session with the attached programs where I replaced "leave"
> in Martin's program by "break".
>
> Don't these programs now behave like Martin expected? In particular, the
> SPAD compiler seems to understand "break".
>
Yes, Spad compiler understands 'break'. But Spad parser does not
treat it as a keyword. I am not sure if difference is visible to
users, but there is good chance that some tricky code can
spot the difference.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
