Which would you consider more correct:
Implementation ==> Type add
or
Implementation ==> add
That's a question for the language experts, since "Type" is a very
special thing. Coming from Aldor, the second (without Type) would be my
favourite.
There should be no need to put anything in front of "add", because one
should be able to use anonymous "add ..." constructions. That's working
in Aldor, but maybe this is another place where SPAD differs.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
