Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> writes: | On 01/19/2012 06:17 PM, Bill Page wrote: | > Ok, so Aldor builds these into the language too. Why not Rep? | | Because that is just a convention and not necessary as a language | construct. (cf. the thread from 2007 that I mentioned earlier).
if the argument hinges on 'convention', then I am a bit disturbed: are you claiming that the builtin types Record, Union, Mapping, Category, etc., are all free of conventions? -- Gaby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
