Bill Page <[email protected]> writes: [...]
| --- | | Mostly unrelated, but since this thread is specifically about language | and there is one programming language that has attracted my attention | several times lately, I wanted to ask if anyone has looked seriously | at Google's new language Go: | | http://golang.org/ I would not say "as seriously as C++ or Haskell", but yes I've looked at it and I receive tons of messages from the go mailing lists daily. My impression (this is just an impression) is that the initial enthusiasm and support behind the language is fading so I am not sure it would be a better investment than improving Spad... [...] | There are a few new ideas here that might make sense even in the | context of Axiom. I especially like the treatment of functions in Go. | Go has function signatures with both named input and named output | parameters. Are they really new ideas? -- Gaby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
