The TeXmacs code generated by
)set output texmacs on
in looks wrong or at least naive to me the case of strings :
(10) -> )set output texmacs on
(10) -> "<alpha>"
(10) "<alpha>"
scheme: (with "mode" "math"
(concat "<alpha>")
)
Type: String
(11) -> "< some other"
(11) "< some other"
scheme: (with "mode" "math"
(concat "< some other")
)
Type: String
(12) ->
I think we can do that better.
On 25 March 2014 10:06, Bill Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> The output (see attached) looks mostly normal to me. There is a
> problem with your example
>
>> "< some literal string from input file"
>
> as you can see TeXmacs is too aggressive in trying to interpret this
> as a TeXmacs symbol since the string begins with <. This has nothing
> to do with my proposed "hack". I think it should be considered either
> a problem with the TeXmacs parsing of FriCAS output or maybe something
> that should be handled by an escape added by the texmacs output
> formatter.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
