Bill Page wrote:
>
> The TeXmacs code generated by
>
> )set output texmacs on
>
> in looks wrong or at least naive to me the case of strings :
>
>
> (10) -> )set output texmacs on
> (10) -> "<alpha>"
>
> (10) "<alpha>"
> scheme: (with "mode" "math"
> (concat "<alpha>")
> )
>
> Type: String
> (11) -> "< some other"
>
> (11) "< some other"
> scheme: (with "mode" "math"
> (concat "< some other")
> )
>
> Type: String
> (12) ->
>
> I think we can do that better.
Yes, string part is easy: we need properly escape special Texmacs
characters during output. But once we do this your input code
will be broken, because '<' and '>' in variables will be escaped
and you will see underlying string instead of Texmacs symbols you
want.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
