Yes, it is true that in a few cases texbreak does not do a very good job. I believe that it was only debugged sufficiently to produce the examples in the original Axiom book. I remember now making a few small changes - something to do with sqrt or something like that. But basically it does work. The structure of the program is quite simple and in principle it is not difficult to improve.
There is another LaTeX-driven package http://www.ctan.org/pkg/breqn That I tried to use but it turned out that Axiom/FriCAS produces an old dialect of TeX/LaTeX that often did not work with breqn. Maybe it would be good to update that LaTeX generation in FriCAS so that this standard tool would work. On 14 April 2014 09:59, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Page wrote (abut texbreak): >> >> It is still in use on axiom-wiki . As I recall I made only minor changes >> in the calling method to suit the the Python environment. > > More specific question would be: Is there any correctly broken up > formula on axiom-wiki. I remember a few cases which were not > handled. > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
