On 04/19/2014 04:06 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > It is possible that one could make working definition of > '\spadsyscom' with paren inside, but in general I find such approach > error prone and confusing: as a general principle I am trying to > have "the same thing" expressed in the same way even if in different > context. So commands in .ht files should look like commands on > command line. That is why repeating ')' is better.
:-( I shouldn't have asked. It's not really that warning that bothers me much, it was just that I recognised this issue. But \spadsys (or rather the seemingly original \spadsyscom already expresses that the argument is what one would write on the command line. That's the actual command. The ")" is just a prefix and logically (at least for me) ist just markup that says "the following is a system command", i.e. in some sense the same thing as \spadsyscomm. My intention somehow is to remove redundancy, i.e. \spadsys and \spadcmd while we have \spadsyscom. Nobody can keep all the different commands from axiom.sty in his head. "\spadsyscom" is not perfect, (maybe \spadsyscmd would be better), but I find it more telling than just \spadsys or \spadcmd. Removing the redundant ")" would be just a logical consequence. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
