On 07/03/2014 03:23 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > There is a hack inside interpreter which converts '=' to > 'equation'.
That's probably not related, but I also cannot get "and" and "or" from OutputForm to work in infix position. (83) -> O==>OutputForm (84) -> (u::O) or (v::O) and (w::O) Argument number 1 to "and" must be a Boolean. Of course, I can use the same trick as for "=", but then I cannot really see whether (84) parses and outputs with "and" having more binding power than "or". The only reason why this does not work is if or$OutputForm is currently not in scope. That would be OK. But adding ")expose OutputForm" doesn't change the above behaviour. BTW, I would prefer to change ")expose SomeDomain" into "import from SomeDomain" to be more in line with SPAD. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
