> I guess my best chance to publish something about this would be > article with title "Current publishing model considered harmful" > expalining pitfals in "trivial" parts.
Very right. This whole journal and peer reviewing system is broken. I more and more like the idea of simply publishing on a website no matter how trivial or wrong something is. The reviewing processs should start afterwards. Good and/or important articles will be cited no matter how "trivial" they are. In a sense that supports Tim's constant arguing of "put the documentation into the code". And also for your "trivial" things I would consider that important. What you find trivial might not be so trivial to somebody else. It's always better to read about the intention of the code in text than figuring that out by reading the code. So please put your "paper" into the repository. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
