>> Both, your patch 0001 and my amendment 0002 are attached. Would be >> nice to see that stuff in FriCAS. Of course you can squash those >> patches together if you like. > > Commited.
Thanks. > I shortened comment for 'prodiag1': most of the comment was writing > the same thing as code only in different notation. Well, I'm not so happy about this. I'm still having the opinion that code is no documentation. My documenation contained a *derivation* of the program code. Why do you dislike that so much that you remove it? For someone to convince himself that the code is OK, he would have to do exactly the same derivation. Of course, a person who is interested in it should be sufficiently smart to be able to redo my derivation, but why does it make sense to let those people reinvest time if the documentation was already there? You did not even have to write it yourself. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
