Well, I don't suppose that it is such a good thing to polarize things any more but I am inclined to agree with Waldek concerning the readability of SPAD versus the limited usefulness and potential pitfalls of verbose documentation. I don't think that the material deleted by Waldek from Ralf's patch had any significant effect on my ability to understand the code. On the other hand, it does seem rather "heavy handed" to me for Waldek to have gone to the trouble of removing it and risking irritating Ralf over a relatively minor issue. FriCAS has too few developers as it is.
Bill. On 24 December 2014 at 13:24, Martin Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24/12/14 18:12, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> It's open source development so I don't have to agree with you and can >> choose to invest my time into something that doesn't make me unhappy. > > I strongly agree with Ralf on this documentation issue. > > Martin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
