On 02/06/2015 09:59 AM, Abhinav Baid wrote:
> [1] https://github.com/fandango-/spad/blob/master/task2.spad
Hmmmm.... it says.
convertOp : L3 -> L1
++ convertOp(l3) converts an operator from LODO3 to LODO1.
Wouldn't be the following implementation meet that specification?
convertOp(l3 : L3) == 0$L1
Right. It does not, because it's not exactly clear what LODO3 and LODO1
actually are. I prefer long names instead of abbreviations. And
furthermore parameters are missing in the specification.
You specification also misses the exact input/output conditions.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
