Bill Page wrote:
>
> On 5 April 2015 at 05:24, Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 04/05/2015 07:37 AM, Bill Page wrote:
> >> After reviewing all of the discussion in this thread concerning
> >> XHashTable, I find that I now agree with Ralf's original response.
> >> Perhaps it is not a good design decision to pass a custom equality
> >> when creating an XHashTable.
> >
> > Oh... and I've already started trying to generalize XHashTable. :-( ;-)
> >
>
> No problem. I do not feel strongly on this issue. If you are
> convinced that generalization is a good idea, by all means continue.
> My conclusion however was that Waldek was right to say initially that
> this is not how it is or should be done in FriCAS/Axiom.
I think that generalizing XHashTable is a good idea. OTOH I
think that trying to use it to implement Kernel (or Expression)
has serious problems.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
