> > > I think that the gains from running FriCAS as a library will out > weight the difference in performance between ECL and SBCL for most > Sage users. > > I doubt that this is the case. Just consider why would you call FriCAS from sage for a computation? I can only think of two reasons:
1) the functionality is not available in sage. (quite unlikely, meanwhile, although there are some bits) 2) FriCAS is much faster. In this case, you probably won't care about a second lost because of a slow interface. for both reasons, I also believe that the most important part of the interface is to highlight features in FriCAS in the docstrings. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
