Am Samstag, 13. August 2016 22:08:16 UTC+2 schrieb Waldek Hebisch: > > Martin R wrote: > > > > > I doubt that this is the case. Just consider why would you call > FriCAS > > from sage for a computation? I can only think of two reasons: > > > > 1) the functionality is not available in sage. (quite unlikely, > meanwhile, > > although there are some bits) > [snipped several examples] >
Thank you for this wonderful list. (that's exactly what I had in mind with "some bits") I think that the ore domain in FriCAS may also be stronger currently (sage is just about to get more here), guessing is the reason why I started all this, series expansion is also much better in FriCAS > > 2) FriCAS is much faster. In this case, you probably won't care about a > > second lost because of a slow interface. > > It depends. If you want to call routine thousends of times > per second than even if base routine is significantly faster > the effective speed may be lower due to interface overheads. > > I am certainly not against a fast interface! (only against putting in more than a week myself) So: if someone helps (as you did already), I'm all for it! I am already very careful to write the "fricas to sage" translation part without parsing of strings. However, in the case you sketch, I'd write a little FriCAS routine and fetch only the end result. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
