Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier wrote:
>
> Nevertheless, my complain is, that
>
> - a "directly" imported package like the add-part of a category (I count
> this as an function of the new domain/package in the first place)
>
> should have compiler priority to be chosen befor a
>
> - further imported functions by the import key word.
Yes, I understand this. As a writer I feel the same.
As a reader I find two functions with the same arguments
and return type with different effect confusing. Note
that compiler does not signal error because logically
"the same" operation may be defined in two different
places. So we should fix compiler to get be more
predictable. But IMO the code you wrote needs
fixing too.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
