Exactly. The compiler is too old... It needs a good réfection. Le 31 déc. 2016 22:11, "Waldek Hebisch" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier wrote: > > > > Nevertheless, my complain is, that > > > > - a "directly" imported package like the add-part of a category (I count > > this as an function of the new domain/package in the first place) > > > > should have compiler priority to be chosen befor a > > > > - further imported functions by the import key word. > > Yes, I understand this. As a writer I feel the same. > As a reader I find two functions with the same arguments > and return type with different effect confusing. Note > that compiler does not signal error because logically > "the same" operation may be defined in two different > places. So we should fix compiler to get be more > predictable. But IMO the code you wrote needs > fixing too. > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
