Isn't "construct" that what Aldor calls "bracket"? Shouldn't somewhere be written that by syntactic sugar
construct [a,b,c] can simply be written as [a, b, c] ? I guess, this was the reason for documenting it the way it was before this patch. Am I wrong? Ralf On 03/09/2018 02:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: > - ++ \spad{construct(x, y, ..., z)} returns the collection of elements > \spad{x, y, ..., z} > + ++ \spad{construct([x, y, ..., z])} returns the collection of elements > \spad{x, y, ..., z} > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
