On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't "construct" that what Aldor calls "bracket"? > Shouldn't somewhere be written that by syntactic sugar > > construct [a,b,c] > > can simply be written as > > [a, b, c] > > ? I guess, this was the reason for documenting it the way it was before > this patch. Am I wrong? > > Ralf > > On 03/09/2018 02:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> - ++ \spad{construct(x, y, ..., z)} returns the collection of elements >> \spad{x, y, ..., z} >> + ++ \spad{construct([x, y, ..., z])} returns the collection of elements >> \spad{x, y, ..., z} >>
Still, that's a syntactic sugar for 'consruct [a,b,c]' (aka 'consruct([a,b,c])'), not 'construct(a,b,c)' -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
