oldk1331 wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Waldek Hebisch <hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl> > wrote: > > Now all things planned for this release are commited. There > > is now time for testing. Qian says that 'sbcl_make_sized_vector' > > is buggy -- I will look into this. > > Any update on 'sbcl_make_sized_vector'?
Earlier: > It is a bug to have "`(ceiling (* ,n ,n-bits) sb-vm:n-word-bits)" > in 'sbcl_make_sized_vector', we should fix it to > "`(ceiling (* ,n ,nb) sb-vm:n-word-bits)". The difference between 'n-bits' and 'nb' is that we want 'nb' but 'n-bits' is what sbcl thinks that we should use. It is safer to use value that sbcl wants to have. So no bug. BTW: The code was changed to current form because simpler version did not work. I do not remember if I tested 'nb' but first formula that I tried did not work, so I changed computation to exactly match what sbcl was doing. > Also I think it is better to use ALLOCATE-VECTOR-WITH-WIDETAG > than ALLOCATE-VECTOR. We can not use ALLOCATE-VECTOR-WITH-WIDETAG because it is not present in earlier versions of sbcl. -- Waldek Hebisch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.