On 12/18/24 4:03 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> Hello Qian.  You removed snippet about ECL performance:
> 
>  CLISP), Clozure CL and GCL the second (about 3 times slower than
>  SBCL), then ECL (about 7 times slower than SBCL) and CLISP is the
>  slowest one.  Note: very old versions of ECL were much (about 4 times)
> -slower, versions from about 7-10 years ago gave best performance and
> -newest ECL versions are progressively slower.
> +slower.
>  
>  Some computation work much faster on 64-bit machines, especially
>  when using SBCL.
> 
> Any reason to do this?
> 

It is just that "7-10 years ago" is not accurate, change it to
release version will be much better.

- Qian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/932f8b0b-23a5-4a6b-9077-eb54cf583bbf%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to