On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 09:39:09AM +0800, Qian Yun wrote:
> On 12/18/24 4:03 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > Hello Qian. You removed snippet about ECL performance:
> >
> > CLISP), Clozure CL and GCL the second (about 3 times slower than
> > SBCL), then ECL (about 7 times slower than SBCL) and CLISP is the
> > slowest one. Note: very old versions of ECL were much (about 4 times)
> > -slower, versions from about 7-10 years ago gave best performance and
> > -newest ECL versions are progressively slower.
> > +slower.
> >
> > Some computation work much faster on 64-bit machines, especially
> > when using SBCL.
> >
> > Any reason to do this?
> >
>
> It is just that "7-10 years ago" is not accurate, change it to
> release version will be much better.
It is reasonably accurate and will be for next 2 years. Certainly
_much_ more accurate than what you commited.
BTW: On more general level, things should be replaced by better
things and removed only when removal leads to improvement.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/Z2Is3Bh2ahNmW1dJ%40fricas.org.
