Sicer me ni bilo na predavanjih, ampak vseeno bi moralo postati ze davno
jasno, da Kononenka in njegovih modrecev in reinkarnacij ni za jemat prevec
resno. Ignore, pa je. :)
Lp,
Rok
P.s. Samo tako btw omenim, da se je Einstein glede vecne locitve religije in
znanosti motil. Enako velja tudi za to, da znanost ne more dokazati
neobstoja boga.
Racionalnost namrec ne locuje med razlicnimi vrstami prepricanj, boga pa
odpravi z
Ockhamovo britvijo. Znanost pa je pac poseben primer racionalnega
razmisljanja.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mitar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FricList" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:11 PM
Subject: [Friclist] PO - Tehnologija znanja
Zdravo!
Kako Kononenko reze iz konteksta. Cudno je, da je Einstain (eden izmed
tistih modrecov katere je omenjal in o kom je precej virov in to
modernih) cisto lepo zapisal te nenapisljive besede. :-)
However "even though the realms of religion and science in themselves
are clearly marked off from each other" there are "strong reciprocal
relationships and dependencies" ... "science without religion is lame,
religion without science is blind ... a legitimate conflict between
science and religion cannot exist." However he makes it clear that he
does not believe in a personal God, and suggests that "neither the rule
of human nor Divine Will exists as an independent cause of natural
events. To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with
natural events could never be refuted ... by science, for [it] can
always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has
not yet been able to set foot."
Divine Will == globji smisel zivljenja, ki ga je omenjal?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views
Mitar
