Mene zanima, kaj je rekel Kononenko... se kdo spomni?... me ni blo na predavanjih.
Ce je kje naredil "ela big mistejk" pa bi ga jaz na to opomnil. Je mogoce izhajal iz clanka Objektivna znanost in subjektivna duhovnost sta komplementarni? http://lkm.fri.uni-lj.si/xaigor/slo/IgorKomplementarnost.doc On 25/10/2007, Matej Pintar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ko že imate debato o tej tematiki, bi vam priporočal, da si sposodite knjigo > Richard Dawkins - Bog kot zabloda. > > Če ste bolj za TV pa si lahko ogledate njegov dokumentarec "Root of all > evil?", ki vsebuje nekaj poglavij iz te knjige. > > Lp, > Matej > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rok > Sent: 24. oktober 2007 23:43 > To: FRIClist > Subject: Re: [Friclist] PO - Tehnologija znanja > > Sicer me ni bilo na predavanjih, ampak vseeno bi moralo postati ze davno > jasno, da Kononenka in njegovih modrecev in reinkarnacij ni za jemat prevec > resno. Ignore, pa je. :) > > Lp, > Rok > > P.s. Samo tako btw omenim, da se je Einstein glede vecne locitve religije in > znanosti motil. Enako velja tudi za to, da znanost ne more dokazati > neobstoja boga. > Racionalnost namrec ne locuje med razlicnimi vrstami prepricanj, boga pa > odpravi z > Ockhamovo britvijo. Znanost pa je pac poseben primer racionalnega > razmisljanja. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mitar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "FricList" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:11 PM > Subject: [Friclist] PO - Tehnologija znanja > > > > Zdravo! > > > > Kako Kononenko reze iz konteksta. Cudno je, da je Einstain (eden izmed > > tistih modrecov katere je omenjal in o kom je precej virov in to > > modernih) cisto lepo zapisal te nenapisljive besede. :-) > > > > However "even though the realms of religion and science in themselves > > are clearly marked off from each other" there are "strong reciprocal > > relationships and dependencies" ... "science without religion is lame, > > religion without science is blind ... a legitimate conflict between > > science and religion cannot exist." However he makes it clear that he > > does not believe in a personal God, and suggests that "neither the rule > > of human nor Divine Will exists as an independent cause of natural > > events. To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with > > natural events could never be refuted ... by science, for [it] can > > always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has > > not yet been able to set foot." > > > > Divine Will == globji smisel zivljenja, ki ga je omenjal? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views > > > > > > Mitar > > > > > > -- www.boris.ednevnik.si
