---------- Forwarded Message -----------
From: ZNet Commentaries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Pilger / The War Lovers / Mar 22

Sustainers PLEASE note:

--> You can change your email address or cc data or temporarily turn off mail
delivery via: 
https://www.zmag.org/sustainers/members

--> If you pass this comment along to others -- periodically but not
repeatedly -- please explain that Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer
Donors of Z/ZNet and that to learn more folks can consult ZNet at
http://www.zmag.org

--> Sustainer Forums Login:
https://www.zmag.org/sustainers/forums

Today's commentary:
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2006-03/22pilger.cfm

==================================

ZNet Commentary
The War Lovers March 22, 2006
By John Pilger

The war lovers I have known in real wars have usually been harmless, except to
themselves. They were attracted to Vietnam and Cambodia, where drugs were
plentiful. Bosnia, with its roulette of death, was another favourite. A few
would say they were there "to tell the world"; the honest ones would say they
loved it. "War is fun!" one of them had scratched on his arm. He stood on a
landmine.

I sometimes remember these almost endearing fools when I find myself faced
with another kind of war lover - the kind that has not seen war and has often
done everything possible not to see it. The passion of these war lovers is a
phenomenon; it never dims, regardless of the distance from the object of their
desire. Pick up the Sunday papers and there they are, egocentrics of little
harsh experience, other than a Saturday in the shopping mall. 
Turn on the television and there they are again, night after night, intoning
not so much their love of war as their sales pitch for it on behalf of the
court to which they are assigned. "There's no doubt," said Matt Frei, the
BBC's man in America, "that the desire to bring good, to bring American values
to the rest of the world, and especially now to the Middle East . . . is now
increasingly tied up with military power."

Frei said that on 13 April 2003, after George W Bush had launched "Shock and
Awe" on a defenceless Iraq. Two years later, after a rampant, racist, woefully
trained and ill-disciplined army of occupation had brought "American values"
of sectarianism, death squads, chemical attacks, attacks with uranium-tipped
shells and cluster bombs, Frei described the notorious 82nd Airborne as "the
heroes of Tikrit".

Last year, he lauded Paul Wolfowitz, architect of the slaughter in Iraq, as
"an intellectual" who "believes passionately in the power of democracy and
grass-roots development". As for Iran, Frei was well ahead of the story. In
June 2003, he told BBC viewers: "There may be a case for regime change in
Iran, too."

How many men, women and children will be killed, maimed or sent mad if Bush
attacks Iran? The prospect of an attack is especially exciting for those war
lovers understandably disappointed by the turn of events in Iraq. "The
unimaginable but ultimately inescapable truth," wrote Gerard Baker in the
Times last month, "is that we are going to have to get ready for war with Iran
. . . If Iran gets safely and unmolested to nuclear status, it will be a
threshold moment in the history of the world, up there with the Bolshevik
revolution and the coming of Hitler." Sound familiar? In February 2003, Baker
wrote that "victory [in Iraq] will quickly vindicate US and British claims
about the scale of the threat Saddam poses".

The "coming of Hitler" is a rallying cry of war lovers. It was heard before
Nato's "moral crusade to save Kosovo" (Blair) in 1999, a model for the
invasion of Iraq. In the attack on Serbia, 2 per cent of Nato's missiles hit
military targets; the rest hit hospitals, schools, factories, churches and
broadcasting studios. Echoing Blair and a clutch of Clinton officials, a
massed media chorus declared that "we" had to stop "something approaching
genocide" in Kosovo, as Timothy Garton Ash wrote in 2002 in the Guardian.
"Echoes of the Holocaust", said the front pages of the Daily Mirror and the 
Sun. 
The Observer warned of a "Balkan Final Solution". The recent death of Slobodan
Milosevic took the war lovers and war sellers down memory lane. Curiously,
"genocide" and "Holocaust" and the "coming of Hitler" were now missing - for
the very good reason that, like the drumbeat leading to the invasion of Iraq
and the drumbeat now leading to an attack on Iran, it was all bullshit. Not
misinterpretation. Not a mistake. Not blunders. Bullshit.

The "mass graves" in Kosovo would justify it all, they said. When the bombing
was over, international forensic teams began subjecting Kosovo to minute
examination. The FBI arrived to investigate what was called "the largest crime
scene in the FBI's forensic history". Several weeks later, having found not a
single mass grave, the FBI and other forensic teams went home.

In 2000, the International War Crimes Tribunal announced that the final count
of bodies found in Kosovo's "mass graves" was 2,788. This included Serbs, Roma
and those killed by "our" allies, the Kosovo Liberation Front. It meant that
the justification for the attack on Serbia ("225,000 ethnic Albanian men aged
between 14 and 59 are missing, presumed dead", the US ambassador-at-large
David Scheffer had claimed) was an invention. To my knowledge, only the Wall
Street Journal admitted this. A former senior Nato planner, Michael McGwire,
wrote that "to describe the bombing as 'humanitarian intervention' [is] really
grotesque". In fact, the Nato "crusade" was the final, calculated act of a
long war of attrition aimed at wiping out the very idea of Yugoslavia.

For me, one of the more odious characteristics of Blair, and Bush, and
Clinton, and their eager or gulled journalistic court, is the enthusiasm of
sedentary, effete men (and women) for bloodshed they never see, bits of body
they never have to retch over, stacked morgues they will never have to visit,
searching for a loved one. Their role is to enforce parallel worlds of
unspoken truth and public lies. That Milosevic was a minnow compared with
industrial-scale killers such as Busa and Blair belongs to the former
------- End of Forwarded Message -------


---
TCB'n,
Noah

"The foundation of all mental illness is the unwillingness to experience
legitimate suffering."
        - Carl Jung

_______________________________________________
FRIENDS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sffreaks.org/mailman/listinfo/friends

Reply via email to