> The two nearest comparable references are:
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-firefox-render-reference.png
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/linux-firefox-render-reference.png

Sorry, I posted the wrong links, they should be:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-ff3-render-reference.png
http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/linux-ff3-render-reference.png

Linux does even better job than Vista does now! Look closely on the
date on the top right corner.


On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 20:34, Huan Truong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott, thanks for your tip. I'll try to convert them all, though it's
> not a perfect solution.
>
> What I have done is copying all over my font library from Windows to
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/windows and it automagically ate up a lot of
> my space. The reason that I have done that was my finding: Ubuntu 8.04
> does a very very impressive work on rendering fonts. I was really
> amazed by that fact, because it was only half a year ago, I could not
> use linux to read long documents because it simply hurts my eyes with
> the way it rendered fonts on screen. Some of the reference renderings
> are:
>
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-ie7-render-reference.png
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-safari-render-reference.png
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-safari-render-reference-2.png
>
> The two nearest comparable references are:
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/vista-firefox-render-reference.png
> http://s3.amazonaws.com/wasabim/linux-firefox-render-reference.png
>
> BTW, I would say 1000 fonts isn't a whole lot of fonts, literally. One
> typeface like this one: http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/delicious.html
> has 6 fonts in it. Some typefaces even have like 20-ish fonts in it.
> So 1000 fonts is only some two-hundreds of typefaces.
>
> Some of the free high-quality links that worth having a look are:
>
> http://www.alvit.de/blog/article/20-best-license-free-official-fonts
> http://www.smashingmagazine.com/category/fonts/
> http://browse.deviantart.com/resources/fonts/?order=9&alltime=yes
>
> - Huan.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 17:33, Scott Thatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I found this script somewhere that will use fontforge to convert a font
>> to truetype.  You may lose some features, but regular things like
>> kerning should be preserved.  There are some truetype options that do
>> affect how well the font works, but I don't know off-hand what the
>> defaults would be when you run this script. You could run it inside
>> another script in order to automate converting all the fonts at once.
>> The only problem I've seen with this approach, is that if a font
>> contains ornaments that are bigger than standard letters (the Adobe Pro
>> fonts often do), then OpenOffice will set it's line height much too
>> high.  Sometimes I've had to edit out certain glyphs to get fancy fonts
>> to play nicely with OpenOffice.
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/fontforge
>> # Quick and dirty hack: converts a font to truetype (.ttf)
>> Print("Opening "+$1);
>> Open($1);
>> Print("Saving "+$1:r+".ttf");
>> Generate($1:r+".ttf");
>> Quit(0);
>>
>> By the way, the people who care about typography would give you this
>> stock response when you mention 1000 fonts:
>>
>> If you got a package with 1000 fonts, it was either
>> - Very expensive, or
>> - Contains fonts of dubious quality and/or legality.
>>
>> Also, many fonts have EULA's that prohibit modification.  Adobe is one
>> exception to that rule.  Their EULA is friendly toward people who need
>> to modify fonts to use with things like Linux and TeX.
>>
>> Sorry if the above is unneeded information, but sometimes I can't help
>> but mention the legalities of type, since respecting licenses is also
>> important in the Open Source world.  :)
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 06:38:07PM -0500, Huan Truong wrote:
>>> I have installed ~1000 OpenType fonts to my laptop. Gedit and stuff
>>> worked fine and I was able to see these fonts, but lately I found out
>>> that OpenOffice and Abiword do not support OpenType fonts (
>>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Font-FAQ#Are_OTF_fonts_supported_in_OpenOffice.org_2
>>> ). Which is crazy to me. I tried OOO 3 but OOO 3 Beta doesn't, either.
>>> I wonder if any of you have any ideas to use those fonts to use in my
>>> documents? I don't mind using alternatives.
>>>
>>> PS: After some minutes googling around, I had the confirmation from
>>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=645363&page=2 . But
>>> converting 1000 fonts with FontForge isn't really a choice for me.
>>> It's so painful to open each of them, and save as... it may drive me
>>> crazy.
>>>
>>> *************************************
>>> I am pretty sure AbiWord doesn't support .otf fonts. Neither does
>>> OpenOffice. Both are treating this not as a bug, but as a feature
>>> request which seems not to be getting top priority. This is a shame,
>>> since most of the major font producers have converted over all their
>>> libraries to OpenType.
>>>
>>> Linux itself should be able to handle the fonts through fontconfig,
>>> and they should be available in Gedit and some other applications.
>>> Check to see if these fonts are available in Gedit; if they are, then
>>> they are properly installed but they won't be available to you in
>>> AbiWord.
>>>
>>> A workaround is to convert the fonts to .ttf using FontForge. You will
>>> lose some of the special features of OpenType (ligatures, special
>>> kerning, etc.) but you should be able to use them in AbiWord and
>>> OpenOffice.org.
>>> *************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>> http://tnhh.info/
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> with Subject: unsubscribe
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with Subject: unsubscribe
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> http://tnhh.info/
>



-- 
"Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
http://tnhh.info/

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with Subject: unsubscribe
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to