On Ma, 07 aug 12, 18:12:40, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > But if we do not talk about nonfree firmware, we do not need to tell > that we do not recommended it.
Why not? > I think telling about nonfree.org would be wrong in the eyes of the FSF. > For me, it would not be a problem. I meant to point users to an easy to remember website that might contain something like www.debian.org/intro/free (too long to mention in that text). Assuming nonfree.org is created I think it's front page should contain something very similar to the text at w.d.o/intro/free. > It is OK for me, but I would prefer a text without the word "non-free" > in it. Just pretending it doesn't exist won't make it go away. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
