On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:43:04 +0100 From: Chris Croughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not saying anything about what 'should' happen, I'm saying that it > does happen and that to pretend that it doesn't is silly.
I, on the other hand, am concerned with what 'should' happen, I expect decisions made, whether they conform to the rules, standing orders etc., or not; to be recorded, (together with the names of those arriving at them), at the very least, so that they can be struck down, confirmed or revisited later. In this case, having regard to the material quoted by Mark, it would appear that the decision fails to meet the requirements needful for it to be considered binding, however as the decision arrived at has not been recorded then it would appear not to be a 'decision' at all as no-one could be bothered to record it. I cannot accept that we the members should be required to accept that the correct forum has made an appropriate decision, or the decision itself, based on what an individual may or may not have a hazy recollection of at a later date. -- John Seago GNU/Linux User #219566 http://counter.li.org AFFS http://www.affs.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
