Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] but to be honest I've never > seen AFFS committee has having the role of deciding how AFFS should be > structured. I also don't think committee should have a role in deciding > the make-up of committee.
Most of the world doesn't care *who* structures things as long as they work, which is part of why committees have that power to approve their own structure, short-term. As long as the membership can overrule committee brain farts/evilness, just f'ing do it. It's poor to fail by refusing to try. > Perhaps (and this is really a topic for AFFS-Project if ever there were > one!) we should have a discussion about exactly what information people > would like to see coming out of committee. [...] Everything which doesn't compromise privacy or confidence should be published, preferably in a way that allows members to hack up reports if they wish (for example, it should be possible for the http://www.affs.org.uk/~mjr/www-src/ to be hosted externally). -- MJ Ray (slef), K. Lynn, England, email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
