Ciaran O'Riordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] to restrict the right > > to use my software for military purposes. > > FWIW, some previous discussion on this topic: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/hessla.html > http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/freeasinbombs > http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript#q11-banning-bad-use
The first argues that governments have other software they would use, the second seems to say other things aren't FSF's goal (not that that stops FSF promoting some IMO-off-topic licenses) and the third suggests that general-purposes programs should be usable for any purpose and field restrictions would be "its own form of tyranny." Related question: given that we refuse to support human rights in our software licences, how can we persuade our projects to support human rights in their purchasing decisions and so on? Related thread: debian t-shirt production and forced child labour http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/11/threads.html#00027 Regards, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
