On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:17:38 Ralph Corderoy wrote: > are any of the free PDF > readers at the level where they can substitute for this type of use?
I don't have an answer yet for this particular case, but I think that its important not to compare all Free Software PDF readers to Acrobat Reader and turn it into a yardstick. Acrobat Reader has many problems of its own, including incompatibility with government forms which meet ISO standards in cases where FS readers succeed, in some cases. It also has a history of serious security vulnerabilities. Governments aren't obliged to stick to ISO PDF standards in the documents that they create, and when they don't, FS PDF readers can't be blamed for problems with reading them. Therefore the question should not be "are any Free Software PDF readers as good as Adobe's?" but rather "do any Free Software PDF readers fully implement ISO PDF standards?", or in cases of specific complex PDF forms "does this form conform to ISO PDF standards? If not, why not?". Trying to chase Adobe's non standard implementation of PDF is a hopeless endeavour - we should all be chasing full ISO standard compliance, and this includes the governments who publish documents in PDF. Thanks, Sam.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list Fsfe-uk@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk