I'm interested in the VFS...I wasn't aware of that...can you point me to info on that? For an app I have I'd like an in memory file system.
Thanks, -Dave On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Sam Mizanin <sammyuglykid...@yahoo.com>wrote: > Salvador, > > The Apache Ftpserver is pretty robust and stable. Have been using it for > sometime. Its easily embedded and can tweak the way you want it which > includes the Authentication module and the FileSystemView. It works great > with the normal file system as well as with the VFS. > > Cheers, > Sam > > > ________________________________ > From: Niklas Gustavsson <nik...@protocol7.com> > To: ftpserver-users@mina.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, 15 September 2013, 14:48 > Subject: Re: Apache FtpServer doubts > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Salvador Alcantara Cano > <salvador.alcant...@uab.cat> wrote: > > I am starting to use Apache FtpServer. It seems a good ftp server, but I > am not sure about the project activity. Is the Apache FtpServer an active > project? How does Apache FtpServer compares with FileZilla? From > ApacheFtpServer I like it a lot to have event hooks via Ftplets...something > like this cannot be achieved with FileZilla. My concern is on robustness > and stability. > > The FtpServer project is somewhat dormant but the code base is > reasonably solid. The way I see it, the major value FtpServer adds is > being embeddable and offering a flexible API for integrating it, like > switching out the file system or integrating with some custom > authentication. If you're looking for a more regular FTP server, > serving files from a normal file system, I'd go with something else, > FileZilla being a good option. > > /niklas >
