Hi Dmitry, This patches are same but they have different Change-Id:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84203/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80689/ I thought we agreed not to change Change-Id when we backport patches, am I right? Thanks On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko <[email protected]>wrote: > FAO core reviewers: > > https://review.openstack.org/84544 (Subs 1.0.0.0 -> 198.18.1.[1|2] in > network checker) -- backport of a fix by Vladimir Kozhukalov, needs to > be reviewed (wasn't a trivial rebase) and merged into fuel-main > stable/4.1 > > https://review.openstack.org/84203 (do not create radosgw region map > in post-deploy) -- backport of my fix for fuel-astute stable/4.1, also > not a trivial rebase, but a very obvious change so should not be a > problem > > https://review.openstack.org/82965 (Set Ceph pg_num dynamically based > on fuel_settings) -- proposed for fuel-library master, will need a > backport once merged, fuel-web counterpart is already merged in master > and stable/4.1 > > https://review.openstack.org/82629 (Use internal IP for internal and > admin RGW endpoints) -- proposed for fuel-library master, will need a > backport once merged, no external dependencies > > I'd rather not establish a bad precedent of summarily merging my own > commits, but these fixes are harmless enough and should really land in > stable/4.1 by the end of this week. > > Thanks, > > -- > Dmitry Borodaenko > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
