This raises an interesting point, if intellectual property is sent in error, do any of the laws pertaining to said property apply 100% or is there a weird shift of how they are applied?
On 7/29/05, Russell Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > These recipients received an email from Austin Mckinley as Cisco Systems. > > This messasge was sent in complete error and includes intellectual > property of ISS and Cisco Systems. Please delete and do not distrbute > the information any further. > > If you have any quesitons, please contact the Cisco PSIRT team. > > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > -- > Russell Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sr. Manager, PSIRT > Customer Assurance Programs > c i s c o S y s t e m s > Phone: 615-791-0972 > Cell: 615-545-6473 > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
