>>> Whatever. My point was that he treated the two situations differently. Why?
>Do you believe in Conspiracy Theories? Do you believe that certain media people, >and indeed, many others get a certain Large Software Company's money for doing things for them? >Well, MSFT is going to issue a critical patch next Tuesday. Maybe this is a shiny object, >intended to divert some media pressure away from an MSFT design botch. Allright, maybe I haven't listened to enough Air America lately, so help me out with how this conspiracy works. Are you saying that Tom Ferris is a Microsoft stooge and the fact that he only announced a critical IE vulnerability without providing details or a POC, whereas he provided both for a critical vulnerability in Firefox, was done because Microsoft paid him to do so? Because that seems to be the essence of what you're implying. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
