and you have no idea what you are talking about since phrack.org != PHC ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'n3td3v'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 4:13 PM Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Return of the Phrack High Council
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Since the 'phrack' email wasn't coming from phrack.org as the real phrack > team does as usual, and since the 'phrack' email writer is happy to show us > he's 12 or 13, I don't see why you bother guys defending phrack here, it > looks evident that it's not coming from the real phrack team, just ignore > those kiddie's posts ... > > - -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de n3td3v > Envoyé : vendredi 25 novembre 2005 15:59 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Full-disclosure] Return of the Phrack High Council > > Youre playing with fire. Fire that cannot be put out with words but only > inflame the situation of which you are misinformed. > > Your opinion is noted, yet you dont have a right to gag my opinion just > because you don't agree with it. > > I have more right to be on a security list than random people like you who > have never contributed security related information to the international > security community, or have a mailing list of your own, and helped vendors > behind the scenes to protect their security from script kids who wish to > destroy it. > > I have done all above listed and continue to do so. If anyone is trolling, > its individuals such as yourself and infosecbofh who have expressed their > hatred for me and my underground security group in public. Finally, is your > web site very secure? Best go check > > On 11/25/05, Cassidy Macfarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, OK, I ignored the troll earlier about Schneier, but please > > *don't* now start having a go at Phrack ffs. > > > > I thought that you had killed off the n3td3v 'personality'? > > > > I realise I am writing a personal opinion email with no new security > > info, But there was no point in you adding your 0.02p to this > > discussion. > > > > 'outdated'??? Have you read 'smashing the stack'? > > > > No? > > > > Thanks for playing. > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > iQIVAwUBQ4cqLK+LRXunxpxfAQIm/BAAq2R7nMcYxNNBhjmLLvroAq4BYkKt1BWu > EXwGgtZSczuNPmx3hzgZ0sroGsARj04zXAbcpRKpR8/eh58CWe3PpO+TUkp0ydof > vBdKFjJMFP2gp6SX+E/YFdVHyS/YTf3HgqU0hVEyKXZKfLiXtjysJbl71KkpJGZt > KGliEcAsbN65ZO7RMRG+MiKL33De+9dgJS3M7MCOd1AEO8mp/O/cEv27MzAKzC7T > 8zUp7+gFRC+5Vlqgcik5x220bGIvpaIVGzreoGEuk090F67uJZtPTvTWm6mjjrDJ > ytxiNCLAvmwNmSWRRX9npWH0/THFY6h2/YNJYxlOEVC6DSDMeaovwez8lmVGm/vo > mENc23PL+F+d6fsHVRQDvJUwD+9MkeucAdu2rahCYQSLcTZn6KYwDzBh2TNLtiuY > VZf1BHK8ZsGxEGZTgfCfBqf2Sfgc8KXe2VrZ2Xf5IgIYVd3ULpiKQuijd2nq0Gt4 > FGz/z/TXFywKQ7WGpF1w8grsWRV4ggGfwdlwi584jsczNHbZgD0pxS+fJeKSwqRj > OR5RFtidJAj7M7QMpQkN885e/zG+q7dURlBR0PI6NSMPyIR7DS4cm03t5ZuKEdEm > qqxLEH2aWLXbxXSOR4kBIhUXtjWjtxZW20/DTOkAnl9wbRFIeLDF5hrPGJJussSd > u7cW6ee7OzA= > =PvVV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
