I second this Michael Evanchik www.michaelevanchik.com
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Full-disclosure] a call for full-disclosure to become a moderatedlist it seems to me that without a moderator (since there is the apparent absence of people who are moderate, or even civilized), this list will continue its degeneration into a never-ending pissing contest. (some people don't seem to think that the social compact one accepts when joining a list applies to them. my most recent attempt to politely, in direct email, ask one of the offenders to stop doing this sort of thing on the list ... was posted with a twerpy reply right back to the list). (no good deed goes unpunished). how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have, since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this position? if you think there's a compelling reason for no moderation, i'd like to hear it. i call to your attention three brief selections from the list charter, which is at http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html which i think have been violated recently: "Members are expected to maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette when posting to the list." "Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken off-list wherever possible." "Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
