Would you mind elaborating on your actual evidence? All I see is logic, but I do not see much hard fact. I'm not agreeing, I'm not disagreeing. I'm just asking for clarification.
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 01:08 +0100, n3td3v wrote: > By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is everyone > only talking about the Georgian sites and infrastructure? If Russian > sites and infrastructure is down as well that means the Georgian > government has hacked them, doesn't it Or does it? Or is the whole > thing just a false flag by the U.S government underworld to infulence > McCain and Obama as they are potentially coming in to the white house? > > It seems to me that there is bias towards Russia in the security > community and that people don't really care if Russia was hacked, > because the community seem to have already chosen who they like and > who they are going to support and who they are going to point blame > at. > > I don't think westerners have ever liked Russia, so as soon as > something like this happens, folks straight away are bias towards > Russia. > > You've got to remember this could easily be a false flag cyber attack > to setup Russia to make them look bad while ramping up cyber security > as a national security agenda as Marcus Sachs > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU says in the Youtube video. > > The reasons for a false flag cyber attack is there, the evidence has > been put in front of you by n3td3v. > > This isn't just some false flag conspiracy, there are plausible > reasons why this could be a false flag. > > In the video Marcus Sachs asked the audience for ways we could make > cyber security a national security agenda, false flagging something > like the Georgian and Russian websites and infrastructure is not a way > the government underworld might make cyber security a national > security agenda? > > I call a false flag, and I find it suspicious that people are only > talking about the Georgian websites and infrastructure being cyber > attacked and not the Russian stuff as well. > > I would be interested in what answers the audience gave to Marcus > Sachs, but thats not in the video unfortunately. > > All the best, > > n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
