-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There's no need as n3td3v got see-throught powa + thight pants
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:23:36 +0200 William McAfee <sec- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Would you mind elaborating on your actual evidence? All I see is >logic, >but I do not see much hard fact. I'm not agreeing, I'm not >disagreeing. >I'm just asking for clarification. > >On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 01:08 +0100, n3td3v wrote: >> By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is >everyone >> only talking about the Georgian sites and infrastructure? If >Russian >> sites and infrastructure is down as well that means the Georgian >> government has hacked them, doesn't it Or does it? Or is the >whole >> thing just a false flag by the U.S government underworld to >infulence >> McCain and Obama as they are potentially coming in to the white >house? >> >> It seems to me that there is bias towards Russia in the security >> community and that people don't really care if Russia was >hacked, >> because the community seem to have already chosen who they like >and >> who they are going to support and who they are going to point >blame >> at. >> >> I don't think westerners have ever liked Russia, so as soon as >> something like this happens, folks straight away are bias >towards >> Russia. >> >> You've got to remember this could easily be a false flag cyber >attack >> to setup Russia to make them look bad while ramping up cyber >security >> as a national security agenda as Marcus Sachs >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU says in the Youtube >video. >> >> The reasons for a false flag cyber attack is there, the evidence >has >> been put in front of you by n3td3v. >> >> This isn't just some false flag conspiracy, there are plausible >> reasons why this could be a false flag. >> >> In the video Marcus Sachs asked the audience for ways we could >make >> cyber security a national security agenda, false flagging >something >> like the Georgian and Russian websites and infrastructure is not >a way >> the government underworld might make cyber security a national >> security agenda? >> >> I call a false flag, and I find it suspicious that people are >only >> talking about the Georgian websites and infrastructure being >cyber >> attacked and not the Russian stuff as well. >> >> I would be interested in what answers the audience gave to >Marcus >> Sachs, but thats not in the video unfortunately. >> >> All the best, >> >> n3td3v >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Charset: UTF8 Version: Hush 3.0 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify wpwEAQMCAAYFAkipOsAACgkQFDPTJDb6CslMrAP+MLrr3GWUd/fN1yp8pbReJ0y/fHpt OwBVolTaGO074JpAMKm91c20/EdlnkUZXtJhu3C2oPGQFNwmcrIkv/Swn64Vqz4GdsNY PxFlLBnF5VdG/R5f03i/4vr7+wxbELBh9apPNhKcR8pymd0E1gdClg9+VGnhSDqe9fNz TKqkbf8= =1mrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Don't leave everything up in the air. Click here for great quotes on flight insurance! http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4ethS67i0iU8P5AvwzT1kCYC46p1UbQtxLq0CqcbkxAWAD6g/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
