you seem like an hd moore/metasploit fan boy pissed off that i don't respect him or like his metasploit software. n3td3v doesn't respect people like the sheep do, i think for myself, have opinions about other white hats that may not be in support of them. get used to it bozo.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Biz Marqee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Acting like the child that he is, n3td3v continues to ignore questions posed > to him. How can he be such an avid debater over the legality of things like > metasploit, 0day auctions and similarly themed bullshit threads when he > completely disregards drug laws? How do you intend to lobby people to listen > to you when you are not a law abiding citizen yourself? You have no > credibility in the eyes of the law, so don't psuedo threaten people trying > to appear like you have some government backing. You have proven beyond > doubt that you dont, because the government doesnt listen to drug taking > internet heroes, such as yourself. > > So enough with the bullshit.. FUCK OFF AND DIE. > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:02 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> i'm sorry that you don't agree with my heads up theory, i stand by >> what i said however. i'm sure microsoft don't read full-disclosure >> anyway, so you're right i'm not going to change anything. by the way, >> i've noticed you haven't stopped stalking me yet, im a bit concerned >> about your health. cheers. >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > first off, u arent going to get any1 2 change anything. so, lets get >> > that out of the way right there. >> > >> > second of all, in order for u 2 prove ur point, id like 4 u to go to >> > some research of how many exploits have come out during the 5 day >> > period between vague-ass disclosure and patch publish. then compare >> > and contrast that against how many exploits have come out in the 24 >> > hours following the patch publish after people have had a chance to do >> > bindiffs (u know what that means right white-hat?) against the >> > patches. then, take all that data, draw some charts and graphs, write >> > a whitepaper, and present it somewhere. >> > >> > u know what thats called? research. real ppl do it. >> > >> > u dont. and that is why, u suck. ta ta. >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> so you don't think its logical that these 5 day heads up could be >> >> helping the bad guys out? right. i think the world's biggest hackers >> >> could do a lot of research in 5 days. but then again n3td3v isn't >> >> logical so i must be wrong. damn those drugs eh? i just asked what the >> >> realistic possibility was for a 5 day turn around from the day of the >> >> heads up until a patch is released. i just thought it was bad that we >> >> were giving the bad guys a 5 day head start, but never mind n3td3v >> >> isn't logical so i must be wrong. scraping the 5 day head start isn't >> >> a good idea because n3td3v isn't logical? right, i threw away 10 years >> >> of my life to not be logical... >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:20 AM, waveroad waveroad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> You can be ""monitoring"" the scene since 20 years if you want to, >> >>> it's not >> >>> for that your point will be valuable. >> >>> And actually it is not, also this is about logic. >> >>> >> >>> See you're wrong again. >> >>> >> >>> Get the fuck out of here. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2008/11/6, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>>> >> >>>> i've been monitoring the scene since 1999 so what do you mean no >> >>>> experience? i make that about 10 years experience if my math is >> >>>> correct. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Biz Marqee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > Do you even understand why people dont like you? It is because you >> >>>> > have >> >>>> > all >> >>>> > these crackpot ideas but no experience to back it up. All your >> >>>> > ideas >> >>>> > only >> >>>> > make sense from a theoretical standpoint, but in practicality most >> >>>> > will >> >>>> > fail. >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> > wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> blackhats like you will always hate on me, so i just ignore the >> >>>> >> negative responses i get. >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> >>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
