this just in: mike c says "n3td3v's group is pointless and redundant"
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:40 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Mike C > > i'd just like to clarify that as of yet I'm not a part of your group as a > matter of principle. there is a far more focussed and serious mailing list > where this stuff belongs. > >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > name 1? >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:01 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, i think the n3td3v groups feed is a bad idea >> >>> because not many serious researchers have joined that group >> >> >> >> there are plenty of serious researchers on the group though they >> >> appear to be taking advantage of the feed instead of talking. >> >> > > I'm sure theres no reason to doubt that. The fact remains full-disclosure is > where it all happens. > > -- > MC > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
