This is just to inform the list that I'm in the process of discussions with the quoted individuals offline, and have made progress in increasing the signal to noise ratio of the full-disclosure mailing list.
(As to the current progress, we're discussing if the rival list n3td3v on google groups may be the reason for the flamish mails. I'll update the list as to the progress here) -- MC On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this just in: mike c says "n3td3v's group is pointless and redundant" > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:40 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Mike C > > > > i'd just like to clarify that as of yet I'm not a part of your group as a > > matter of principle. there is a far more focussed and serious mailing > list > > where this stuff belongs. > > > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > name 1? > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:01 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >>> For what it's worth, i think the n3td3v groups feed is a bad idea > >> >>> because not many serious researchers have joined that group > >> >> > >> >> there are plenty of serious researchers on the group though they > >> >> appear to be taking advantage of the feed instead of talking. > >> >> > > > > I'm sure theres no reason to doubt that. The fact remains full-disclosure > is > > where it all happens. > > > > -- > > MC > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
